Mali vs Serbia: All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2)
All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2) over time
- Mali
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 29,316 kt against 28,224 kt in Mali, a difference of 1,092 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Mali ranks 103rd and Serbia ranks 101st of 257 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mali averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 27,641 kt | 35,531 kt | 7,891 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 30,366 kt | 29,726 kt | 639.63 kt | Mali |
| 2020s | 28,947 kt | 30,090 kt | 1,143 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors with lulucf — emissions, Mali or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 29,316 kt against 28,224 kt in Mali as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors with lulucf — emissions between Mali and Serbia?
- 1,092 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Serbia rank globally for all sectors with lulucf — emissions?
- Mali ranks 103rd and Serbia ranks 101st of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf