Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O)

Australia and New Zealand
428.01 kt
in 2023
Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1,624 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
10th

All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O) over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
05001.0k1.5k199020062023

How they compare

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) currently reports 1,624 kt against 428.01 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1,196 kt.

That makes Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s figure about 3.8 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 10th of 257 countries.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 324.31 kt 1,043 kt 718.42 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2000s 342.08 kt 1,285 kt 943.3 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2010s 332.16 kt 1,555 kt 1,223 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
2020s 318.77 kt 1,635 kt 1,316 kt Least Developed Countries (LDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors with lulucf — emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs), at 1,624 kt against 428.01 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors with lulucf — emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
1,196 kt, with Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for all sectors with lulucf — emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 10th of 257 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-with-lulucf-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-with-lulucf-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/least-developed-countries-ldcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
291 places, 9,669 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf