Nicaragua vs Serbia: All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions
All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions over time
- Nicaragua
- Serbia
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 13.78 kt against 13.28 kt in Serbia, a difference of 0.5 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 91st and Serbia ranks 92nd of 222 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.71 kt | 15.25 kt | 6.54 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 11 kt | 13.46 kt | 2.46 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 12.65 kt | 13.1 kt | 0.4502 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors with lulucf — emissions, Nicaragua or Serbia?
- Nicaragua, at 13.78 kt against 13.28 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors with lulucf — emissions between Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 0.5 kt, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Nicaragua and Serbia rank globally for all sectors with lulucf — emissions?
- Nicaragua ranks 91st and Serbia ranks 92nd of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors with LULUCF — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf