Belgium-Luxembourg vs Sudan (former): All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Belgium-Luxembourg currently reports 154,505 kt against 151,824 kt in Sudan (former), a difference of 2,681 kt.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 52nd and Sudan (former) ranks 53rd of 257 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq), Belgium-Luxembourg or Sudan (former)?
- Belgium-Luxembourg, at 154,505 kt against 151,824 kt in Sudan (former) as of 1999.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) between Belgium-Luxembourg and Sudan (former)?
- 2,681 kt, with Belgium-Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Sudan (former)?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Sudan (former) rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq)?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 52nd and Sudan (former) ranks 53rd of 257 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf