How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nigeria?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Belarus vs Nigeria: All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions … CO2eq square kilometre

Belarus

0.4472 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Nigeria

0.4392 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Belarus rank

73rd

Nigeria rank

75th

All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions … CO2eq square kilometre over time

Belarus
Nigeria

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.4472 kt per square kilometre against 0.4392 kt per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 0.008 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 73rd and Nigeria ranks 75th of 201 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Belarus	Nigeria	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.5002 kt per square kilometre	0.3947 kt per square kilometre	0.1055 kt per square kilometre	Belarus
2000s	0.452 kt per square kilometre	0.3961 kt per square kilometre	0.0558 kt per square kilometre	Belarus
2010s	0.4808 kt per square kilometre	0.4194 kt per square kilometre	0.0614 kt per square kilometre	Belarus
2020s	0.4602 kt per square kilometre	0.4367 kt per square kilometre	0.0234 kt per square kilometre	Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Belarus or Nigeria?: Belarus, at 0.4472 kt per square kilometre against 0.4392 kt per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Belarus and Nigeria?: 0.008 kt per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nigeria?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Nigeria rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?: Belarus ranks 73rd and Nigeria ranks 75th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Nigeria: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/nigeria/">Belarus vs Nigeria: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.