Congo vs Zimbabwe: All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions … CO2eq square kilometre

Congo
0.0723 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0767 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
161st
Zimbabwe rank
159th

All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions … CO2eq square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Zimbabwe
00.020.040.060.08199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0767 kt per square kilometre against 0.0723 kt per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0044 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Congo ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0442 kt per square kilometre 0.0836 kt per square kilometre 0.0394 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0568 kt per square kilometre 0.0726 kt per square kilometre 0.0158 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0679 kt per square kilometre 0.0742 kt per square kilometre 0.0063 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.073 kt per square kilometre 0.0716 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Congo or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0767 kt per square kilometre against 0.0723 kt per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Congo and Zimbabwe?
0.0044 kt per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Congo ranks 161st and Zimbabwe ranks 159th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zimbabwe: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo vs Zimbabwe: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.