Estonia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions … CO2eq square kilometre

Estonia
0.4109 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.3972 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia rank
81st
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
83rd

All sectors without LULUCF: Emissions … CO2eq square kilometre over time

  • Estonia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.20.40.60.8199020062023

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 0.4109 kt per square kilometre against 0.3972 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0137 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 81st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 83rd of 201 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5791 kt per square kilometre 0.087 kt per square kilometre 0.4921 kt per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 0.5331 kt per square kilometre 0.2085 kt per square kilometre 0.3246 kt per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 0.6143 kt per square kilometre 0.344 kt per square kilometre 0.2704 kt per square kilometre Estonia
2020s 0.4292 kt per square kilometre 0.3923 kt per square kilometre 0.0369 kt per square kilometre Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square, Estonia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Estonia, at 0.4109 kt per square kilometre against 0.3972 kt per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square between Estonia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0137 kt per square kilometre, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Estonia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square?
Estonia ranks 81st and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 83rd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/estonia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/estonia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Estonia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.