China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

China, Hong Kong SAR
489.94 kt
in 2023
Eswatini
466.32 kt
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
143rd
Eswatini rank
146th

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Eswatini
02004006008001.0k199020062023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 489.94 kt against 466.32 kt in Eswatini, a difference of 23.62 kt.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 143rd and Eswatini ranks 146th of 222 countries.

China, Hong Kong SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 709 kt 467.94 kt 241.05 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 571.58 kt 438.95 kt 132.63 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 569.77 kt 474.5 kt 95.26 kt China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 492.34 kt 475.28 kt 17.06 kt China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, China, Hong Kong SAR or Eswatini?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 489.94 kt against 466.32 kt in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini?
23.62 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 143rd and Eswatini ranks 146th of 222 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/china-hong-kong-sar/eswatini/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 9,163 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf