Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Russian Federation: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Democratic Republic of the Congo
15,947 kt
in 2023
Russian Federation
80,626 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
9th
Russian Federation rank
8th

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • Russian Federation
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199020062023

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 80,626 kt against 15,947 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo, a difference of 64,679 kt.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 5.1 times Democratic Republic of the Congo's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 9th and Russian Federation ranks 8th of 22 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo Russian Federation Difference Ahead
1990s 13,926 kt 77,593 kt 63,667 kt Russian Federation
2000s 14,870 kt 66,570 kt 51,699 kt Russian Federation
2010s 15,660 kt 72,972 kt 57,312 kt Russian Federation
2020s 16,324 kt 80,443 kt 64,119 kt Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Democratic Republic of the Congo or Russian Federation?
Russian Federation, at 80,626 kt against 15,947 kt in Democratic Republic of the Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Russian Federation?
64,679 kt, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and Russian Federation?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and Russian Federation rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 9th and Russian Federation ranks 8th of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Russian Federation: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/russian-federation-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/russian-federation-2/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs Russian Federation: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 9,163 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf