Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Syrian Arab Republic: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Lao People's Democratic Republic
3,898 kt
in 2023
Syrian Arab Republic
4,299 kt
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
13th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
12th

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Syrian Arab Republic
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k199020062023

How they compare

Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 4,299 kt against 3,898 kt in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 401 kt.

That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 1.1 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Syrian Arab Republic has been ahead every year.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 13th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 12th of 22 countries.

Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 1,608 kt 4,435 kt 2,826 kt Syrian Arab Republic
2000s 1,930 kt 5,447 kt 3,517 kt Syrian Arab Republic
2010s 2,711 kt 4,184 kt 1,473 kt Syrian Arab Republic
2020s 3,373 kt 3,916 kt 542.91 kt Syrian Arab Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Syrian Arab Republic?
Syrian Arab Republic, at 4,299 kt against 3,898 kt in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Syrian Arab Republic?
401 kt, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Syrian Arab Republic?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 13th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 12th of 22 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Syrian Arab Republic: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/syrian-arab-republic-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/lao-people-s-democratic-republic/syrian-arab-republic-2/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Syrian Arab Republic: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
276 places, 9,163 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf