How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kazakhstan vs Namibia: All sectors without LULUCF … N2O CO2eq square kilometre

Kazakhstan

0.0037 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Namibia

0.0039 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Kazakhstan rank

180th

Namibia rank

178th

All sectors without LULUCF … N2O CO2eq square kilometre over time

Kazakhstan
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0039 kt per square kilometre against 0.0037 kt per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 180th and Namibia ranks 178th of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kazakhstan	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.004 kt per square kilometre	0.0036 kt per square kilometre	0.0004 kt per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2000s	0.0035 kt per square kilometre	0.004 kt per square kilometre	0.0005 kt per square kilometre	Namibia
2010s	0.0039 kt per square kilometre	0.0044 kt per square kilometre	0.0005 kt per square kilometre	Namibia
2020s	0.0039 kt per square kilometre	0.0041 kt per square kilometre	0.0002 kt per square kilometre	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per, Kazakhstan or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0.0039 kt per square kilometre against 0.0037 kt per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per between Kazakhstan and Namibia?: 0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Kazakhstan and Namibia rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per?: Kazakhstan ranks 180th and Namibia ranks 178th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs Namibia: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/kazakhstan/namibia/">Kazakhstan vs Namibia: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.