How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Serbia vs Uruguay: All sectors without LULUCF … N2O CO2eq square kilometre

Serbia

0.0419 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Uruguay

0.0423 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia rank

56th

Uruguay rank

55th

All sectors without LULUCF … N2O CO2eq square kilometre over time

Serbia
Uruguay

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 0.0423 kt per square kilometre against 0.0419 kt per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Serbia ranks 56th and Uruguay ranks 55th of 201 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Serbia	Uruguay	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0462 kt per square kilometre	0.0403 kt per square kilometre	0.0058 kt per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	0.0408 kt per square kilometre	0.041 kt per square kilometre	0.0002 kt per square kilometre	Uruguay
2020s	0.0412 kt per square kilometre	0.0423 kt per square kilometre	0.0011 kt per square kilometre	Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per, Serbia or Uruguay?: Uruguay, at 0.0423 kt per square kilometre against 0.0419 kt per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per between Serbia and Uruguay?: 0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Serbia and Uruguay rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per?: Serbia ranks 56th and Uruguay ranks 55th of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Uruguay: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/serbia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/serbia/uruguay/">Serbia vs Uruguay: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.