How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?

12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: All sectors without LULUCF … N2O CO2eq square kilometre

Sudan

0.0146 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0.0142 kt per square kilometre

in 2023

Sudan rank

139th

Zimbabwe rank

142nd

All sectors without LULUCF … N2O CO2eq square kilometre over time

Sudan
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 0.0146 kt per square kilometre against 0.0142 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0004 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Sudan ranks 139th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 201 countries.

Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sudan	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.0145 kt per square kilometre	0.0134 kt per square kilometre	0.0011 kt per square kilometre	Sudan
2020s	0.0148 kt per square kilometre	0.0137 kt per square kilometre	0.0011 kt per square kilometre	Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per, Sudan or Zimbabwe?: Sudan, at 0.0146 kt per square kilometre against 0.0142 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per between Sudan and Zimbabwe?: 0.0004 kt per square kilometre, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per?: Sudan ranks 139th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sudan vs Zimbabwe: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/sudan/zimbabwe/">Sudan vs Zimbabwe: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit: kt per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 10 October 2026

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.