Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: All sectors without LULUCF … N2O CO2eq square kilometre

Turkmenistan
0.0145 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0142 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan rank
140th
Zimbabwe rank
142nd

All sectors without LULUCF … N2O CO2eq square kilometre over time

  • Turkmenistan
  • Zimbabwe
0.0050.0070.010.0130.015199020062023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0.0145 kt per square kilometre against 0.0142 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Turkmenistan ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 201 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Turkmenistan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turkmenistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0048 kt per square kilometre 0.0136 kt per square kilometre 0.0089 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0085 kt per square kilometre 0.0138 kt per square kilometre 0.0054 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0121 kt per square kilometre 0.0139 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0141 kt per square kilometre 0.0137 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per, Turkmenistan or Zimbabwe?
Turkmenistan, at 0.0145 kt per square kilometre against 0.0142 kt per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per between Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Turkmenistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions (co2eq) from n2o (ar5), per?
Turkmenistan ranks 140th and Zimbabwe ranks 142nd of 201 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/turkmenistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-per-square-kilometre/turkmenistan/zimbabwe/">Turkmenistan vs Zimbabwe: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 6,749 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.