Botswana vs Iceland: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share

Botswana
90.71 %
in 2023
Iceland
89.06 %
in 2023
Botswana rank
128th
Iceland rank
131st

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share over time

  • Botswana
  • Iceland
020406080100199020062023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 90.71 % against 89.06 % in Iceland, a difference of 1.65 %.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 128th and Iceland ranks 131st of 208 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 85.17 % 78 % 7.17 % Botswana
2000s 87.49 % 83.25 % 4.23 % Botswana
2010s 91.5 % 86.5 % 5 % Botswana
2020s 91.19 % 87.95 % 3.25 % Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions share, Botswana or Iceland?
Botswana, at 90.71 % against 89.06 % in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions share between Botswana and Iceland?
1.65 %, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Iceland?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Iceland rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions share?
Botswana ranks 128th and Iceland ranks 131st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2)
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
242 places, 8,008 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.