Congo vs Serbia: All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share

Congo
224.62 %
in 2023
Serbia
186.17 %
in 2023
Congo rank
3rd
Serbia rank
6th

All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share over time

  • Congo
  • Serbia
050100150200250199020062023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 224.62 % against 186.17 % in Serbia, a difference of 38.45 %.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Congo ranks 3rd and Serbia ranks 6th of 208 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 35.3 % 170.17 % 134.87 % Serbia
2010s 30.14 % 184.28 % 154.14 % Serbia
2020s 182.49 % 182.61 % 0.1275 % Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share, Congo or Serbia?
Congo, at 224.62 % against 186.17 % in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share between Congo and Serbia?
38.45 %, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Congo and Serbia rank globally for all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share?
Congo ranks 3rd and Serbia ranks 6th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share (CO2)
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
242 places, 8,008 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.