Australia vs El Salvador: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq)
Australia
101.61 %
in 2023
El Salvador
101.6 %
in 2023
Australia rank
48th
El Salvador rank
49th
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) over time
- Australia
- El Salvador
How they compare
Australia currently reports 101.61 % against 101.6 % in El Salvador, a difference of 0.01 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was El Salvador ahead.
Australia ranks 48th and El Salvador ranks 49th of 223 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 90.84 % | 92.78 % | 1.95 % | El Salvador |
| 2000s | 90.64 % | 94.11 % | 3.47 % | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 101.42 % | 100.13 % | 1.29 % | Australia |
| 2020s | 101.67 % | 101.69 % | 0.0125 % | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions share (co2eq), Australia or El Salvador?
- Australia, at 101.61 % against 101.6 % in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions share (co2eq) between Australia and El Salvador?
- 0.01 %, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and El Salvador?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Australia and El Salvador rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions share (co2eq)?
- Australia ranks 48th and El Salvador ranks 49th of 223 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.