Eswatini vs Iceland: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq)
Eswatini
90.33 %
in 2023
Iceland
91.04 %
in 2023
Eswatini rank
140th
Iceland rank
139th
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) over time
- Eswatini
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 91.04 % against 90.33 % in Eswatini, a difference of 0.71 %.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 140th and Iceland ranks 139th of 209 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 89.1 % | 84.22 % | 4.89 % | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 89.85 % | 87.09 % | 2.76 % | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 89.3 % | 89.59 % | 0.291 % | Iceland |
| 2020s | 90.28 % | 90.4 % | 0.1175 % | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — emissions share (co2eq), Eswatini or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 91.04 % against 90.33 % in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — emissions share (co2eq) between Eswatini and Iceland?
- 0.71 %, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Iceland?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Iceland rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — emissions share (co2eq)?
- Eswatini ranks 140th and Iceland ranks 139th of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.