Ethiopia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): All sectors without LULUCF — Indirect emissions

Ethiopia
62.23 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
283.76 kt
in 2023
Ethiopia rank
6th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
8th

All sectors without LULUCF — Indirect emissions over time

  • Ethiopia
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
0100200300199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 283.76 kt against 62.23 kt in Ethiopia, a difference of 221.53 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 4.6 times Ethiopia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Ethiopia ranks 6th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th of 192 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ethiopia Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 23.29 kt 113.57 kt 90.28 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 31.95 kt 144.69 kt 112.74 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 48.06 kt 223.2 kt 175.15 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 59.94 kt 275.28 kt 215.34 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher all sectors without lulucf — indirect emissions, Ethiopia or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 283.76 kt against 62.23 kt in Ethiopia as of 2023.
What is the difference in all sectors without lulucf — indirect emissions between Ethiopia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
221.53 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Ethiopia and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for all sectors without lulucf — indirect emissions?
Ethiopia ranks 6th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 8th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as All sectors without LULUCF — Indirect emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ethiopia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): All sectors without LULUCF — Indirect emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ethiopia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/all-sectors-without-lulucf-indirect-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/ethiopia/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Ethiopia vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): All sectors without LULUCF — Indirect emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Indirect emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
244 places, 8,019 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf