Aruba vs Hong Kong: Annual CO₂ emissions from wildfires
Aruba
0 tonnes
in 2026
Hong Kong
600.56 tonnes
in 2026
Aruba rank
187th
Hong Kong rank
184th
Annual CO₂ emissions from wildfires over time
- Aruba
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 600.56 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Aruba, a difference of 600.56 tonnes.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 187th and Hong Kong ranks 184th of 248 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 302.25 tonnes | 143,532 tonnes | 143,230 tonnes | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 1,206 tonnes | 103,624 tonnes | 102,418 tonnes | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 5,681 tonnes | 127,202 tonnes | 121,520 tonnes | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from wildfires, Aruba or Hong Kong?
- Hong Kong, at 600.56 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Aruba as of 2026.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from wildfires between Aruba and Hong Kong?
- 600.56 tonnes, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Hong Kong?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2026.
- How do Aruba and Hong Kong rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from wildfires?
- Aruba ranks 187th and Hong Kong ranks 184th of 248 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual CO₂ emissions from wildfires. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Carbon dioxide released by wildfires in tonnes. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 18 September 2026.