Aruba vs Malta: Annual CO₂ emissions from wildfires

Aruba
0 tonnes
in 2026
Malta
0 tonnes
in 2026
Aruba rank
187th
Malta rank
187th

Annual CO₂ emissions from wildfires over time

  • Aruba
  • Malta
05.0k10.0k15.0k200320142026

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Malta, a difference of 0 tonnes.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Malta ahead.

Aruba ranks 187th and Malta ranks 187th of 248 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 302.25 tonnes 190.35 tonnes 111.9 tonnes Aruba
2010s 1,206 tonnes 906.27 tonnes 299.6 tonnes Aruba
2020s 5,681 tonnes 717.98 tonnes 4,963 tonnes Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from wildfires, Aruba or Malta?
Aruba, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Malta as of 2026.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from wildfires between Aruba and Malta?
0 tonnes, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Malta?
24 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2026.
How do Aruba and Malta rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from wildfires?
Aruba ranks 187th and Malta ranks 187th of 248 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual CO₂ emissions from wildfires. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions from wildfires
Unit
tonnes
Source
Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
248 places, 5,952 data points, 2003–2026
Last refreshed

Carbon dioxide released by wildfires in tonnes. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 07 August 2026.