Aruba vs Monaco: Annual CO₂ emissions from wildfires
Aruba
0 tonnes
in 2026
Monaco
0 tonnes
in 2026
Aruba rank
187th
Monaco rank
187th
Annual CO₂ emissions from wildfires over time
- Aruba
- Monaco
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Monaco, a difference of 0 tonnes.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Monaco ahead.
Aruba ranks 187th and Monaco ranks 187th of 248 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Monaco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 302.25 tonnes | 1,485 tonnes | 1,183 tonnes | Monaco |
| 2010s | 1,206 tonnes | 40.89 tonnes | 1,165 tonnes | Aruba |
| 2020s | 5,681 tonnes | 27.08 tonnes | 5,654 tonnes | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from wildfires, Aruba or Monaco?
- Aruba, at 0 tonnes against 0 tonnes in Monaco as of 2026.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from wildfires between Aruba and Monaco?
- 0 tonnes, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Monaco?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2026.
- How do Aruba and Monaco rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from wildfires?
- Aruba ranks 187th and Monaco ranks 187th of 248 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Wildfire Information System (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual CO₂ emissions from wildfires. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Carbon dioxide released by wildfires in tonnes. The 2026 data is incomplete and was last updated 07 August 2026.