Belarus vs Netherlands: Annual change in primary energy from low-carbon energy

Belarus
4.09 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Netherlands
4.53 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Belarus rank
25th
Netherlands rank
22nd

Annual change in primary energy from low-carbon energy over time

  • Belarus
  • Netherlands
-1001020196619952025

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 4.53 terawatt-hours against 4.09 terawatt-hours in Belarus, a difference of 0.44 terawatt-hours.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Netherlands ahead.

Belarus ranks 25th and Netherlands ranks 22nd of 80 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Netherlands Difference Ahead
1980s 0 terawatt-hours 0.4529 terawatt-hours 0.4529 terawatt-hours Netherlands
1990s -0.0001 terawatt-hours 0.2794 terawatt-hours 0.2795 terawatt-hours Netherlands
2000s 0.0445 terawatt-hours 2.27 terawatt-hours 2.22 terawatt-hours Netherlands
2010s 0.073 terawatt-hours 1.41 terawatt-hours 1.34 terawatt-hours Netherlands
2020s 8.82 terawatt-hours 8.48 terawatt-hours 0.3406 terawatt-hours Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual change in primary energy from low-carbon energy, Belarus or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 4.53 terawatt-hours against 4.09 terawatt-hours in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in annual change in primary energy from low-carbon energy between Belarus and Netherlands?
0.44 terawatt-hours, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Netherlands?
40 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Netherlands rank globally for annual change in primary energy from low-carbon energy?
Belarus ranks 25th and Netherlands ranks 22nd of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Annual change in primary energy from low-carbon energy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Netherlands: Annual change in primary energy from low-carbon energy. Statizoid, drawing on Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-low-carbon-energy/belarus/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-change-low-carbon-energy/belarus/netherlands/">Belarus vs Netherlands: Annual change in primary energy from low-carbon energy</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual change in primary energy from low-carbon energy
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Smil (2017) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
82 places, 4,604 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.