El Salvador vs Latvia: Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate
El Salvador
9.13 % change on previous year
in 2024
Latvia
9.3 % change on previous year
in 2024
El Salvador rank
26th
Latvia rank
25th
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate over time
- El Salvador
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 9.3 % change on previous year against 9.13 % change on previous year in El Salvador, a difference of 0.17 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 86 times across 173 shared years of data; in 1851 it was Latvia ahead.
El Salvador ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 25th of 188 countries.
Across the 18 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 9 and Latvia in 9.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 5.14 % change on previous year | 0.2541 % change on previous year | 4.89 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1860s | -1.4 % change on previous year | -0.9 % change on previous year | 0.4976 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 1870s | 3.31 % change on previous year | 0.1676 % change on previous year | 3.14 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1880s | 1.38 % change on previous year | 0.209 % change on previous year | 1.17 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1890s | -0.9309 % change on previous year | 0.2226 % change on previous year | 1.15 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 1900s | 13.36 % change on previous year | 0.311 % change on previous year | 13.05 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1910s | 6.92 % change on previous year | -4.12 % change on previous year | 11.04 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1920s | -15.39 % change on previous year | -1.42 % change on previous year | 13.96 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 1930s | 11.94 % change on previous year | -3.48 % change on previous year | 15.42 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1940s | 0.7154 % change on previous year | -13.23 % change on previous year | 13.94 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1950s | 3.33 % change on previous year | 19.24 % change on previous year | 15.91 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 1960s | -10.62 % change on previous year | -7.63 % change on previous year | 2.99 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 1970s | 23.01 % change on previous year | 1.95 % change on previous year | 21.06 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1980s | 0.2269 % change on previous year | -2.52 % change on previous year | 2.75 % change on previous year | El Salvador |
| 1990s | 5.61 % change on previous year | 46.3 % change on previous year | 40.69 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2000s | -13.07 % change on previous year | 4.2 % change on previous year | 17.27 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2010s | 29.23 % change on previous year | 232.59 % change on previous year | 203.35 % change on previous year | Latvia |
| 2020s | 5.8 % change on previous year | 14.25 % change on previous year | 8.44 % change on previous year | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate, El Salvador or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 9.3 % change on previous year against 9.13 % change on previous year in El Salvador as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate between El Salvador and Latvia?
- 0.17 % change on previous year, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Latvia?
- 173 years are reported by both, from 1851 to 2024.
- How do El Salvador and Latvia rank globally for annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- El Salvador ranks 26th and Latvia ranks 25th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.