Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Latvia
Latvia: Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate was 9.3 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
9.3 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 51.8%
World rank
25th
of 188 countries
All-time high
798.91 % change on previous year
in 2015
All-time low
-211.69 % change on previous year
in 2007
Years of data
174
1851–2024
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Latvia, 1851–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Latvia recorded 9.3 % change on previous year for annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 51.8% on the previous year and down 97.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Latvia peaked at 798.91 % change on previous year in 2015 and was at its lowest, -211.69 % change on previous year, in 2007.
That places Latvia 25th out of 188 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Latvia, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1851 | -1.1 % change on previous year | — |
| 1852 | -0.0824 % change on previous year | -92.5% |
| 1853 | -0.3547 % change on previous year | +330.4% |
| 1854 | 2.35 % change on previous year | -761.8% |
| 1855 | -0.7468 % change on previous year | -131.8% |
| 1856 | -0.2653 % change on previous year | -64.5% |
| 1857 | 0.7272 % change on previous year | -374.1% |
| 1858 | 0.1721 % change on previous year | -76.3% |
| 1859 | 1.59 % change on previous year | +820.9% |
| 1860 | -5.55 % change on previous year | -450.3% |
| 1861 | -1.28 % change on previous year | -77.0% |
| 1862 | -0.6906 % change on previous year | -46.0% |
| 1863 | 0.3893 % change on previous year | -156.4% |
| 1864 | -0.7918 % change on previous year | -303.4% |
| 1865 | -0.1738 % change on previous year | -78.0% |
| 1866 | -1.49 % change on previous year | +757.8% |
| 1867 | 1.39 % change on previous year | -193.5% |
| 1868 | -1.15 % change on previous year | -182.4% |
| 1869 | 0.344 % change on previous year | -130.0% |
| 1870 | 1.56 % change on previous year | +352.6% |
| 1871 | -1.52 % change on previous year | -197.7% |
| 1872 | -0.2272 % change on previous year | -85.1% |
| 1873 | -0.0681 % change on previous year | -70.0% |
| 1874 | 0.5765 % change on previous year | -946.3% |
| 1875 | -0.3853 % change on previous year | -166.8% |
| 1876 | 0.1419 % change on previous year | -136.8% |
| 1877 | 0.2271 % change on previous year | +60.0% |
| 1878 | 1.15 % change on previous year | +404.4% |
| 1879 | 0.2298 % change on previous year | -79.9% |
| 1880 | -0.1481 % change on previous year | -164.4% |
| 1881 | -0.7127 % change on previous year | +381.4% |
| 1882 | 1.17 % change on previous year | -264.5% |
| 1883 | 1.27 % change on previous year | +8.3% |
| 1884 | 0.2511 % change on previous year | -80.2% |
| 1885 | -0.5309 % change on previous year | -311.5% |
| 1886 | 0.0264 % change on previous year | -105.0% |
| 1887 | 0.8966 % change on previous year | +3295.5% |
| 1888 | -0.3121 % change on previous year | -134.8% |
| 1889 | 0.1781 % change on previous year | -157.1% |
| 1890 | 1.69 % change on previous year | +849.9% |
| 1891 | -0.4131 % change on previous year | -124.4% |
| 1892 | -1.12 % change on previous year | +170.2% |
| 1893 | -0.6288 % change on previous year | -43.7% |
| 1894 | -0.393 % change on previous year | -37.5% |
| 1895 | 1.4 % change on previous year | -456.4% |
| 1896 | -0.0335 % change on previous year | -102.4% |
| 1897 | 0.393 % change on previous year | -1272.6% |
| 1898 | 1.49 % change on previous year | +279.6% |
| 1899 | -0.1663 % change on previous year | -111.2% |
| 1900 | -0.3744 % change on previous year | +125.1% |
| 1901 | 2.03 % change on previous year | -641.1% |
| 1902 | -1.61 % change on previous year | -179.3% |
| 1903 | 1.75 % change on previous year | -208.9% |
| 1904 | -0.4417 % change on previous year | -125.3% |
| 1905 | 0.5214 % change on previous year | -218.0% |
| 1906 | -0.0728 % change on previous year | -114.0% |
| 1907 | 0.2897 % change on previous year | -497.8% |
| 1908 | 0.3902 % change on previous year | +34.7% |
| 1909 | 0.629 % change on previous year | +61.2% |
| 1910 | -14.67 % change on previous year | -2432.3% |
| 1911 | -5.24 % change on previous year | -64.3% |
| 1912 | -3.68 % change on previous year | -29.8% |
| 1913 | -2.78 % change on previous year | -24.3% |
| 1914 | -2.42 % change on previous year | -12.9% |
| 1915 | -1.76 % change on previous year | -27.4% |
| 1916 | -4.03 % change on previous year | +128.9% |
| 1917 | -1.87 % change on previous year | -53.6% |
| 1918 | -1.62 % change on previous year | -13.1% |
| 1919 | -3.11 % change on previous year | +92.0% |
| 1920 | -0.8843 % change on previous year | -71.6% |
| 1921 | -1.98 % change on previous year | +123.8% |
| 1922 | -1.7 % change on previous year | -14.0% |
| 1923 | -2.52 % change on previous year | +48.0% |
| 1924 | -0.7878 % change on previous year | -68.7% |
| 1925 | -0.5779 % change on previous year | -26.6% |
| 1926 | -2.85 % change on previous year | +392.3% |
| 1927 | -2.98 % change on previous year | +4.9% |
| 1928 | -1.48 % change on previous year | -50.5% |
| 1929 | 1.52 % change on previous year | -203.3% |
| 1930 | -11.44 % change on previous year | -850.0% |
| 1931 | -2.67 % change on previous year | -76.7% |
| 1932 | -2.4 % change on previous year | -9.9% |
| 1933 | -3.7 % change on previous year | +54.2% |
| 1934 | -2.44 % change on previous year | -34.0% |
| 1935 | -3.92 % change on previous year | +60.6% |
| 1936 | 0.5704 % change on previous year | -114.5% |
| 1937 | -6.12 % change on previous year | -1173.6% |
| 1938 | 1.36 % change on previous year | -122.2% |
| 1939 | -4.02 % change on previous year | -395.5% |
| 1940 | -13.84 % change on previous year | +243.9% |
| 1941 | -7.69 % change on previous year | -44.4% |
| 1942 | -9.9 % change on previous year | +28.8% |
| 1943 | -11.06 % change on previous year | +11.7% |
| 1944 | -11.83 % change on previous year | +7.0% |
| 1945 | -12.73 % change on previous year | +7.6% |
| 1946 | -14.88 % change on previous year | +16.8% |
| 1947 | -15.81 % change on previous year | +6.3% |
| 1948 | -24.71 % change on previous year | +56.3% |
| 1949 | -9.83 % change on previous year | -60.2% |
| 1950 | -2.29 % change on previous year | -76.7% |
| 1951 | 59.01 % change on previous year | -2680.1% |
| 1952 | 51.02 % change on previous year | -13.5% |
| 1953 | 19.9 % change on previous year | -61.0% |
| 1954 | 16.7 % change on previous year | -16.1% |
| 1955 | 16.13 % change on previous year | -3.4% |
| 1956 | 11.98 % change on previous year | -25.7% |
| 1957 | 10 % change on previous year | -16.6% |
| 1958 | 5.08 % change on previous year | -49.2% |
| 1959 | 4.84 % change on previous year | -4.6% |
| 1960 | -31.5 % change on previous year | -750.1% |
| 1961 | 4.37 % change on previous year | -113.9% |
| 1962 | -27.13 % change on previous year | -720.7% |
| 1963 | -8.86 % change on previous year | -67.3% |
| 1964 | 7.88 % change on previous year | -188.9% |
| 1965 | -22.65 % change on previous year | -387.4% |
| 1966 | -1.53 % change on previous year | -93.3% |
| 1967 | -4.96 % change on previous year | +224.7% |
| 1968 | 32.15 % change on previous year | -748.0% |
| 1969 | -24.08 % change on previous year | -174.9% |
| 1970 | -6.92 % change on previous year | -71.3% |
| 1971 | 20.45 % change on previous year | -395.4% |
| 1972 | -0.44 % change on previous year | -102.2% |
| 1973 | 18.62 % change on previous year | -4331.9% |
| 1974 | -30.6 % change on previous year | -264.3% |
| 1975 | 27.88 % change on previous year | -191.1% |
| 1976 | 2.92 % change on previous year | -89.5% |
| 1977 | -18.41 % change on previous year | -731.5% |
| 1978 | -14.64 % change on previous year | -20.5% |
| 1979 | 20.61 % change on previous year | -240.8% |
| 1980 | 1.61 % change on previous year | -92.2% |
| 1981 | 19.61 % change on previous year | +1115.9% |
| 1982 | -7.65 % change on previous year | -139.0% |
| 1983 | -12.69 % change on previous year | +65.8% |
| 1984 | 7.41 % change on previous year | -158.4% |
| 1985 | 0.9529 % change on previous year | -87.1% |
| 1986 | -13.33 % change on previous year | -1498.8% |
| 1987 | -12.55 % change on previous year | -5.9% |
| 1988 | -8.91 % change on previous year | -29.0% |
| 1989 | 0.3217 % change on previous year | -103.6% |
| 1990 | 0.6932 % change on previous year | +115.5% |
| 1991 | 23.8 % change on previous year | +3333.2% |
| 1992 | -16.85 % change on previous year | -170.8% |
| 1993 | 653.77 % change on previous year | -3980.4% |
| 1994 | -177.24 % change on previous year | -127.1% |
| 1995 | 34.93 % change on previous year | -119.7% |
| 1996 | -43.85 % change on previous year | -225.5% |
| 1997 | -4.31 % change on previous year | -90.2% |
| 1998 | -22.03 % change on previous year | +411.1% |
| 1999 | 14.11 % change on previous year | -164.1% |
| 2000 | -14.72 % change on previous year | -204.3% |
| 2001 | 13.76 % change on previous year | -193.5% |
| 2002 | -4.41 % change on previous year | -132.1% |
| 2003 | 56.62 % change on previous year | -1382.9% |
| 2004 | 166.33 % change on previous year | +193.8% |
| 2005 | 156.03 % change on previous year | -6.2% |
| 2006 | -111.25 % change on previous year | -171.3% |
| 2007 | -211.69 % change on previous year | +90.3% |
| 2008 | 14.81 % change on previous year | -107.0% |
| 2009 | -23.49 % change on previous year | -258.6% |
| 2010 | 30.95 % change on previous year | -231.8% |
| 2011 | 85.37 % change on previous year | +175.8% |
| 2012 | 702.39 % change on previous year | +722.8% |
| 2013 | -108.44 % change on previous year | -115.4% |
| 2014 | 431.05 % change on previous year | -497.5% |
| 2015 | 798.91 % change on previous year | +85.3% |
| 2016 | -68.29 % change on previous year | -108.5% |
| 2017 | -21.51 % change on previous year | -68.5% |
| 2018 | 160.82 % change on previous year | -847.8% |
| 2019 | -26.42 % change on previous year | -116.4% |
| 2020 | -1.35 % change on previous year | -94.9% |
| 2021 | -32.63 % change on previous year | +2322.4% |
| 2022 | 76.61 % change on previous year | -334.8% |
| 2023 | 19.29 % change on previous year | -74.8% |
| 2024 | 9.3 % change on previous year | -51.8% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 9.3 % change on previous year is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -0.6131 % change on previous year. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Latvia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1973 | +4331.9% | -0.44 % change on previous year | 18.62 % change on previous year |
| 1993 | +3980.4% | -16.85 % change on previous year | 653.77 % change on previous year |
| 1991 | +3333.2% | 0.6932 % change on previous year | 23.8 % change on previous year |
| 1887 | +3295.5% | 0.0264 % change on previous year | 0.8966 % change on previous year |
| 1951 | +2680.1% | -2.29 % change on previous year | 59.01 % change on previous year |
| 1910 | -2432.3% | 0.629 % change on previous year | -14.67 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 0.2541 % change on previous year | -1.1 % change on previous year | 2.35 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1860s | -0.9 % change on previous year | -5.55 % change on previous year | 1.39 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 0.1676 % change on previous year | -1.52 % change on previous year | 1.56 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.209 % change on previous year | -0.7127 % change on previous year | 1.27 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.2226 % change on previous year | -1.12 % change on previous year | 1.69 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.311 % change on previous year | -1.61 % change on previous year | 2.03 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | -4.12 % change on previous year | -14.67 % change on previous year | -1.62 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | -1.42 % change on previous year | -2.98 % change on previous year | 1.52 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | -3.48 % change on previous year | -11.44 % change on previous year | 1.36 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | -13.23 % change on previous year | -24.71 % change on previous year | -7.69 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 19.24 % change on previous year | -2.29 % change on previous year | 59.01 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | -7.63 % change on previous year | -31.5 % change on previous year | 32.15 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.95 % change on previous year | -30.6 % change on previous year | 27.88 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -2.52 % change on previous year | -13.33 % change on previous year | 19.61 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 46.3 % change on previous year | -177.24 % change on previous year | 653.77 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.2 % change on previous year | -211.69 % change on previous year | 166.33 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 198.48 % change on previous year | -108.44 % change on previous year | 798.91 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 14.25 % change on previous year | -32.63 % change on previous year | 76.61 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 22 Uzbekistan 11.17 % change on previous year compare
- 23 Tanzania 11.15 % change on previous year compare
- 24 Guinea-Bissau 10.37 % change on previous year compare
- 26 El Salvador 9.13 % change on previous year compare
- 27 Libya 9.06 % change on previous year compare
- 28 Trinidad and Tobago 8.83 % change on previous year compare
More climate change data for Latvia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 43.09 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,340 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 263.83 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,077 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.9956 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 38.45 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 342.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 336.47 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 6.33 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.27 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Latvia?
- Annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Latvia was 9.3 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 798.91 % change on previous year in 2015.
- What is the lowest annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was -211.69 % change on previous year in 2007.
- How does Latvia rank for annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Latvia ranks 25th out of 188 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 97.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 174 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.