Armenia vs Costa Rica: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Armenia
7.46 million tonnes
in 2024
Costa Rica
7.77 million tonnes
in 2024
Armenia rank
142nd
Costa Rica rank
141st

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Armenia
  • Costa Rica
020.0M40.0M60.0M185019372024

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 7.77 million tonnes against 7.46 million tonnes in Armenia, a difference of 318,950 tonnes.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 155 shared years of data; in 1870 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Armenia ranks 142nd and Costa Rica ranks 141st of 194 countries.

Across the 16 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 15.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1870s 798,303 tonnes 4.50 million tonnes 3.70 million tonnes Costa Rica
1880s 790,572 tonnes 4.56 million tonnes 3.77 million tonnes Costa Rica
1890s 687,894 tonnes 6.50 million tonnes 5.81 million tonnes Costa Rica
1900s 597,017 tonnes 7.40 million tonnes 6.81 million tonnes Costa Rica
1910s 476,368 tonnes 8.54 million tonnes 8.06 million tonnes Costa Rica
1920s 203,989 tonnes 6.93 million tonnes 6.72 million tonnes Costa Rica
1930s 3.39 million tonnes 17.15 million tonnes 13.76 million tonnes Costa Rica
1940s 1.79 million tonnes 28.78 million tonnes 26.99 million tonnes Costa Rica
1950s 2.56 million tonnes 32.51 million tonnes 29.95 million tonnes Costa Rica
1960s 3.27 million tonnes 29.73 million tonnes 26.45 million tonnes Costa Rica
1970s 5.79 million tonnes 43.62 million tonnes 37.83 million tonnes Costa Rica
1980s 7.81 million tonnes 27.09 million tonnes 19.29 million tonnes Costa Rica
1990s 5.13 million tonnes 7.34 million tonnes 2.21 million tonnes Costa Rica
2000s 6.78 million tonnes 9.96 million tonnes 3.18 million tonnes Costa Rica
2010s 6.18 million tonnes 10.37 million tonnes 4.19 million tonnes Costa Rica
2020s 7.44 million tonnes 7.15 million tonnes 284,592 tonnes Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Armenia or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 7.77 million tonnes against 7.46 million tonnes in Armenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Armenia and Costa Rica?
318,950 tonnes, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Costa Rica?
155 years are reported by both, from 1870 to 2024.
How do Armenia and Costa Rica rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Armenia ranks 142nd and Costa Rica ranks 141st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Costa Rica: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/armenia/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/armenia/costa-rica/">Armenia vs Costa Rica: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.