Belarus vs Guatemala: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Belarus
52.30 million tonnes
in 2024
Guatemala
49.46 million tonnes
in 2024
Belarus rank
65th
Guatemala rank
68th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Belarus
  • Guatemala
050.0M100.0M150.0M185019372024

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 52.30 million tonnes against 49.46 million tonnes in Guatemala, a difference of 2.84 million tonnes.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 155 shared years of data; in 1870 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 65th and Guatemala ranks 68th of 194 countries.

Across the 16 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 15 and Guatemala in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Guatemala Difference Ahead
1870s 40.53 million tonnes 4.96 million tonnes 35.57 million tonnes Belarus
1880s 41.61 million tonnes 3.10 million tonnes 38.51 million tonnes Belarus
1890s 42.46 million tonnes 2.46 million tonnes 39.99 million tonnes Belarus
1900s 44.72 million tonnes 5.10 million tonnes 39.62 million tonnes Belarus
1910s 42.79 million tonnes 7.09 million tonnes 35.69 million tonnes Belarus
1920s 42.04 million tonnes 9.33 million tonnes 32.71 million tonnes Belarus
1930s 49.99 million tonnes 21.61 million tonnes 28.37 million tonnes Belarus
1940s 49.64 million tonnes 47.98 million tonnes 1.66 million tonnes Belarus
1950s 56.54 million tonnes 57.20 million tonnes 653,120 tonnes Guatemala
1960s 74.54 million tonnes 26.34 million tonnes 48.20 million tonnes Belarus
1970s 101.73 million tonnes 30.14 million tonnes 71.58 million tonnes Belarus
1980s 124.01 million tonnes 53.52 million tonnes 70.49 million tonnes Belarus
1990s 88.64 million tonnes 60.29 million tonnes 28.35 million tonnes Belarus
2000s 61.01 million tonnes 54.07 million tonnes 6.94 million tonnes Belarus
2010s 64.34 million tonnes 44.21 million tonnes 20.13 million tonnes Belarus
2020s 55.32 million tonnes 48.00 million tonnes 7.32 million tonnes Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Belarus or Guatemala?
Belarus, at 52.30 million tonnes against 49.46 million tonnes in Guatemala as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Belarus and Guatemala?
2.84 million tonnes, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Guatemala?
155 years are reported by both, from 1870 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Guatemala rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Belarus ranks 65th and Guatemala ranks 68th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Guatemala: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/belarus/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/belarus/guatemala/">Belarus vs Guatemala: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.