Congo vs Hungary: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Congo
26.17 million tonnes
in 2024
Hungary
29.27 million tonnes
in 2024
Congo rank
100th
Hungary rank
97th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Congo
  • Hungary
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M185119372024

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 29.27 million tonnes against 26.17 million tonnes in Congo, a difference of 3.10 million tonnes.

That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 100th and Hungary ranks 97th of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Hungary in 7.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Hungary Difference Ahead
1950s 68.04 million tonnes 31.86 million tonnes 36.18 million tonnes Congo
1960s 22.12 million tonnes 54.87 million tonnes 32.75 million tonnes Hungary
1970s 8.92 million tonnes 73.28 million tonnes 64.36 million tonnes Hungary
1980s 7.60 million tonnes 81.06 million tonnes 73.46 million tonnes Hungary
1990s 18.37 million tonnes 58.27 million tonnes 39.90 million tonnes Hungary
2000s 22.55 million tonnes 51.35 million tonnes 28.80 million tonnes Hungary
2010s 27.48 million tonnes 38.26 million tonnes 10.78 million tonnes Hungary
2020s 26.23 million tonnes 35.72 million tonnes 9.49 million tonnes Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Congo or Hungary?
Hungary, at 29.27 million tonnes against 26.17 million tonnes in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Congo and Hungary?
3.10 million tonnes, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Hungary?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Congo and Hungary rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Congo ranks 100th and Hungary ranks 97th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Hungary: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/congo-rep/hungary/">Congo vs Hungary: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.