Ecuador vs Trinidad and Tobago: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Ecuador
33.80 million tonnes
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
34.41 million tonnes
in 2024
Ecuador rank
86th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
85th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Ecuador
  • Trinidad and Tobago
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M189219582024

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 34.41 million tonnes against 33.80 million tonnes in Ecuador, a difference of 609,100 tonnes.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 116 shared years of data; in 1909 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 86th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 85th of 194 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1900s 16.32 million tonnes 2.49 million tonnes 13.83 million tonnes Ecuador
1910s 13.64 million tonnes 1.83 million tonnes 11.82 million tonnes Ecuador
1920s 11.65 million tonnes 2.17 million tonnes 9.48 million tonnes Ecuador
1930s 51.72 million tonnes 5.72 million tonnes 46.00 million tonnes Ecuador
1940s 49.09 million tonnes 12.19 million tonnes 36.90 million tonnes Ecuador
1950s 61.30 million tonnes 2.42 million tonnes 58.87 million tonnes Ecuador
1960s 44.33 million tonnes 2.88 million tonnes 41.45 million tonnes Ecuador
1970s 59.26 million tonnes 11.79 million tonnes 47.47 million tonnes Ecuador
1980s 82.93 million tonnes 16.38 million tonnes 66.55 million tonnes Ecuador
1990s 57.95 million tonnes 17.59 million tonnes 40.36 million tonnes Ecuador
2000s 43.74 million tonnes 35.14 million tonnes 8.60 million tonnes Ecuador
2010s 62.66 million tonnes 43.51 million tonnes 19.15 million tonnes Ecuador
2020s 41.64 million tonnes 35.61 million tonnes 6.03 million tonnes Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Ecuador or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 34.41 million tonnes against 33.80 million tonnes in Ecuador as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago?
609,100 tonnes, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago?
116 years are reported by both, from 1909 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Ecuador ranks 86th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 85th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Trinidad and Tobago: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/ecuador/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/ecuador/trinidad-and-tobago/">Ecuador vs Trinidad and Tobago: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.