El Salvador vs Latvia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

El Salvador
9.17 million tonnes
in 2024
Latvia
9.41 million tonnes
in 2024
El Salvador rank
132nd
Latvia rank
129th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • El Salvador
  • Latvia
010.0M20.0M30.0M185019372024

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 9.41 million tonnes against 9.17 million tonnes in El Salvador, a difference of 238,990 tonnes.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 155 shared years of data; in 1870 it was Latvia ahead.

El Salvador ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 129th of 194 countries.

Across the 16 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 13.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Latvia Difference Ahead
1870s 3.40 million tonnes 10.40 million tonnes 6.99 million tonnes Latvia
1880s 3.30 million tonnes 10.71 million tonnes 7.42 million tonnes Latvia
1890s 2.49 million tonnes 11.06 million tonnes 8.57 million tonnes Latvia
1900s 5.77 million tonnes 11.64 million tonnes 5.87 million tonnes Latvia
1910s 9.59 million tonnes 8.92 million tonnes 672,886 tonnes El Salvador
1920s 3.41 million tonnes 7.16 million tonnes 3.76 million tonnes Latvia
1930s 3.92 million tonnes 6.95 million tonnes 3.03 million tonnes Latvia
1940s 4.58 million tonnes 5.15 million tonnes 571,593 tonnes Latvia
1950s 5.44 million tonnes 10.30 million tonnes 4.86 million tonnes Latvia
1960s 4.31 million tonnes 14.97 million tonnes 10.66 million tonnes Latvia
1970s 7.29 million tonnes 21.67 million tonnes 14.38 million tonnes Latvia
1980s 6.39 million tonnes 24.29 million tonnes 17.90 million tonnes Latvia
1990s 8.45 million tonnes 8.09 million tonnes 355,036 tonnes El Salvador
2000s 7.33 million tonnes 4.58 million tonnes 2.75 million tonnes El Salvador
2010s 6.52 million tonnes 8.63 million tonnes 2.11 million tonnes Latvia
2020s 7.90 million tonnes 8.99 million tonnes 1.09 million tonnes Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, El Salvador or Latvia?
Latvia, at 9.41 million tonnes against 9.17 million tonnes in El Salvador as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between El Salvador and Latvia?
238,990 tonnes, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Latvia?
155 years are reported by both, from 1870 to 2024.
How do El Salvador and Latvia rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
El Salvador ranks 132nd and Latvia ranks 129th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Latvia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/el-salvador/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/el-salvador/latvia/">El Salvador vs Latvia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.