Rwanda vs Suriname: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Rwanda
4.32 million tonnes
in 2024
Suriname
3.16 million tonnes
in 2024
Rwanda rank
157th
Suriname rank
160th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Rwanda
  • Suriname
02.0M4.0M6.0M8.0M10.0M195019872024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 4.32 million tonnes against 3.16 million tonnes in Suriname, a difference of 1.16 million tonnes.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.4 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 157th and Suriname ranks 160th of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 6 and Suriname in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Suriname Difference Ahead
1950s 6.84 million tonnes 832,450 tonnes 6.01 million tonnes Rwanda
1960s 5.33 million tonnes 1.84 million tonnes 3.48 million tonnes Rwanda
1970s 7.98 million tonnes 3.49 million tonnes 4.48 million tonnes Rwanda
1980s 5.91 million tonnes 4.08 million tonnes 1.83 million tonnes Rwanda
1990s 3.37 million tonnes 4.51 million tonnes 1.14 million tonnes Suriname
2000s 5.55 million tonnes 4.35 million tonnes 1.20 million tonnes Rwanda
2010s 3.79 million tonnes 5.09 million tonnes 1.29 million tonnes Suriname
2020s 4.61 million tonnes 3.47 million tonnes 1.14 million tonnes Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Rwanda or Suriname?
Rwanda, at 4.32 million tonnes against 3.16 million tonnes in Suriname as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Rwanda and Suriname?
1.16 million tonnes, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Suriname?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Suriname rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Rwanda ranks 157th and Suriname ranks 160th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Suriname: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/rwanda/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/rwanda/suriname/">Rwanda vs Suriname: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.