Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled

Sri Lanka
31.18 million tonnes
in 2024
Tunisia
31.34 million tonnes
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
93rd
Tunisia rank
92nd

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled over time

  • Sri Lanka
  • Tunisia
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M191619702024

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 31.34 million tonnes against 31.18 million tonnes in Sri Lanka, a difference of 163,300 tonnes.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 75 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Sri Lanka ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 92nd of 194 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Sri Lanka averaged higher in 7 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sri Lanka Tunisia Difference Ahead
1950s 24.88 million tonnes 9.37 million tonnes 15.51 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1960s 50.76 million tonnes 7.85 million tonnes 42.91 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1970s 24.43 million tonnes 12.08 million tonnes 12.35 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1980s 14.84 million tonnes 13.13 million tonnes 1.72 million tonnes Sri Lanka
1990s 20.12 million tonnes 18.36 million tonnes 1.76 million tonnes Sri Lanka
2000s 37.70 million tonnes 24.44 million tonnes 13.26 million tonnes Sri Lanka
2010s 37.08 million tonnes 31.00 million tonnes 6.08 million tonnes Sri Lanka
2020s 29.56 million tonnes 30.85 million tonnes 1.29 million tonnes Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 31.34 million tonnes against 31.18 million tonnes in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
163,300 tonnes, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
75 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2024.
How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled?
Sri Lanka ranks 93rd and Tunisia ranks 92nd of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/sri-lanka/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-gaps-filled/sri-lanka/tunisia/">Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, gaps filled
Unit
tonnes
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 21,015 data points, 1850–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change with 79 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.