Argentina vs Nicaragua: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre

Argentina
115.27 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Nicaragua
121.83 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
137th
Nicaragua rank
134th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Argentina
  • Nicaragua
0200400600800196119922024

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 121.83 tonnes per square kilometre against 115.27 tonnes per square kilometre in Argentina, a difference of 6.56 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Argentina's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Argentina ranks 137th and Nicaragua ranks 134th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Nicaragua Difference Ahead
1960s 60.62 tonnes per square kilometre 223.58 tonnes per square kilometre 162.96 tonnes per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 56.3 tonnes per square kilometre 153.3 tonnes per square kilometre 97 tonnes per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 55.84 tonnes per square kilometre 254.78 tonnes per square kilometre 198.94 tonnes per square kilometre Nicaragua
1990s 65.61 tonnes per square kilometre 559.88 tonnes per square kilometre 494.26 tonnes per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 132.06 tonnes per square kilometre 435.86 tonnes per square kilometre 303.8 tonnes per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 122.86 tonnes per square kilometre 141.34 tonnes per square kilometre 18.49 tonnes per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 118.61 tonnes per square kilometre 114.2 tonnes per square kilometre 4.42 tonnes per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre, Argentina or Nicaragua?
Nicaragua, at 121.83 tonnes per square kilometre against 115.27 tonnes per square kilometre in Argentina as of 2023.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre between Argentina and Nicaragua?
6.56 tonnes per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Nicaragua?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Nicaragua rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre?
Argentina ranks 137th and Nicaragua ranks 134th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Nicaragua: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/argentina/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/argentina/nicaragua/">Argentina vs Nicaragua: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,987 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.