Barbados vs Nauru: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre

Barbados
3,005 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Nauru
2,923 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Barbados rank
11th
Nauru rank
13th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Nauru
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922024

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 3,005 tonnes per square kilometre against 2,923 tonnes per square kilometre in Nauru, a difference of 82 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Nauru ahead.

Barbados ranks 11th and Nauru ranks 13th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 2 and Nauru in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Nauru Difference Ahead
1960s 788.58 tonnes per square kilometre 2,137 tonnes per square kilometre 1,349 tonnes per square kilometre Nauru
1970s 1,295 tonnes per square kilometre 4,800 tonnes per square kilometre 3,504 tonnes per square kilometre Nauru
1980s 1,884 tonnes per square kilometre 6,907 tonnes per square kilometre 5,023 tonnes per square kilometre Nauru
1990s 2,579 tonnes per square kilometre 5,478 tonnes per square kilometre 2,898 tonnes per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 3,337 tonnes per square kilometre 3,004 tonnes per square kilometre 332.61 tonnes per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 3,135 tonnes per square kilometre 2,455 tonnes per square kilometre 680.15 tonnes per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 2,807 tonnes per square kilometre 2,833 tonnes per square kilometre 26.04 tonnes per square kilometre Nauru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre, Barbados or Nauru?
Barbados, at 3,005 tonnes per square kilometre against 2,923 tonnes per square kilometre in Nauru as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre between Barbados and Nauru?
82 tonnes per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Nauru?
61 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Nauru rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 11th and Nauru ranks 13th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Nauru: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/barbados/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/barbados/naoero/">Barbados vs Nauru: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,987 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.