Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Saudi Arabia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre

Bosnia and Herzegovina
367.27 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
322.19 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
69th
Saudi Arabia rank
71st

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Saudi Arabia
-2000200400196119922024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 367.27 tonnes per square kilometre against 322.19 tonnes per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 45.08 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 69th and Saudi Arabia ranks 71st of 192 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Saudi Arabia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s 15.46 tonnes per square kilometre 123.03 tonnes per square kilometre 107.57 tonnes per square kilometre Saudi Arabia
2000s 216.29 tonnes per square kilometre 186.29 tonnes per square kilometre 30 tonnes per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 376.93 tonnes per square kilometre 285.71 tonnes per square kilometre 91.22 tonnes per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 384.89 tonnes per square kilometre 315.08 tonnes per square kilometre 69.81 tonnes per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Saudi Arabia?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 367.27 tonnes per square kilometre against 322.19 tonnes per square kilometre in Saudi Arabia as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Saudi Arabia?
45.08 tonnes per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Saudi Arabia?
33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Saudi Arabia rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 69th and Saudi Arabia ranks 71st of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Saudi Arabia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/saudi-arabia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Saudi Arabia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,987 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.