Cape Verde vs Costa Rica: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre

Cape Verde
148.04 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Costa Rica
153.76 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Cape Verde rank
123rd
Costa Rica rank
120th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Costa Rica
02505007501.0k1.2k196119922024

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 153.76 tonnes per square kilometre against 148.04 tonnes per square kilometre in Cape Verde, a difference of 5.72 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 123rd and Costa Rica ranks 120th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 9.24 tonnes per square kilometre 591.02 tonnes per square kilometre 581.79 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 24.45 tonnes per square kilometre 854.34 tonnes per square kilometre 829.89 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 26.17 tonnes per square kilometre 530.64 tonnes per square kilometre 504.47 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 74.96 tonnes per square kilometre 143.79 tonnes per square kilometre 68.83 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 136.84 tonnes per square kilometre 195.14 tonnes per square kilometre 58.3 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 149.03 tonnes per square kilometre 203.06 tonnes per square kilometre 54.03 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 142.78 tonnes per square kilometre 141.15 tonnes per square kilometre 1.63 tonnes per square kilometre Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre, Cape Verde or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 153.76 tonnes per square kilometre against 148.04 tonnes per square kilometre in Cape Verde as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre between Cape Verde and Costa Rica?
5.72 tonnes per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Costa Rica?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cape Verde and Costa Rica rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre?
Cape Verde ranks 123rd and Costa Rica ranks 120th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Costa Rica: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/cabo-verde/costa-rica/">Cape Verde vs Costa Rica: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,987 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.