Cambodia vs South Africa: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre

Cambodia
369.95 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
South Africa
365.71 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Cambodia rank
68th
South Africa rank
70th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Cambodia
  • South Africa
02004006008001.0k196119922024

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 369.95 tonnes per square kilometre against 365.71 tonnes per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 4.24 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 68th and South Africa ranks 70th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 238.76 tonnes per square kilometre 160.51 tonnes per square kilometre 78.25 tonnes per square kilometre Cambodia
1970s 33.99 tonnes per square kilometre 210.68 tonnes per square kilometre 176.7 tonnes per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 409.83 tonnes per square kilometre 307.45 tonnes per square kilometre 102.39 tonnes per square kilometre Cambodia
1990s 262.23 tonnes per square kilometre 352.55 tonnes per square kilometre 90.32 tonnes per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 269.23 tonnes per square kilometre 387.08 tonnes per square kilometre 117.85 tonnes per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 304.11 tonnes per square kilometre 385.46 tonnes per square kilometre 81.36 tonnes per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 358.12 tonnes per square kilometre 362.27 tonnes per square kilometre 4.15 tonnes per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre, Cambodia or South Africa?
Cambodia, at 369.95 tonnes per square kilometre against 365.71 tonnes per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre between Cambodia and South Africa?
4.24 tonnes per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and South Africa?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cambodia and South Africa rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre?
Cambodia ranks 68th and South Africa ranks 70th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs South Africa: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/south-africa/">Cambodia vs South Africa: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,987 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.