Cameroon vs Madagascar: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre

Cameroon
69.99 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Madagascar
61.14 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Cameroon rank
156th
Madagascar rank
159th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Cameroon
  • Madagascar
50100150200250196119922024

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports 69.99 tonnes per square kilometre against 61.14 tonnes per square kilometre in Madagascar, a difference of 8.85 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Cameroon's figure about 1.1 times Madagascar's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.

Cameroon ranks 156th and Madagascar ranks 159th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cameroon averaged higher in 3 and Madagascar in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 83.13 tonnes per square kilometre 93.52 tonnes per square kilometre 10.39 tonnes per square kilometre Madagascar
1970s 94.82 tonnes per square kilometre 110.94 tonnes per square kilometre 16.13 tonnes per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 71.48 tonnes per square kilometre 70.39 tonnes per square kilometre 1.09 tonnes per square kilometre Cameroon
1990s 59.3 tonnes per square kilometre 136.78 tonnes per square kilometre 77.48 tonnes per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 87.26 tonnes per square kilometre 128.02 tonnes per square kilometre 40.76 tonnes per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 91.84 tonnes per square kilometre 69.05 tonnes per square kilometre 22.79 tonnes per square kilometre Cameroon
2020s 73.3 tonnes per square kilometre 59.67 tonnes per square kilometre 13.63 tonnes per square kilometre Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre, Cameroon or Madagascar?
Cameroon, at 69.99 tonnes per square kilometre against 61.14 tonnes per square kilometre in Madagascar as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre between Cameroon and Madagascar?
8.85 tonnes per square kilometre, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Madagascar?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cameroon and Madagascar rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre?
Cameroon ranks 156th and Madagascar ranks 159th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cameroon vs Madagascar: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/cameroon/madagascar/">Cameroon vs Madagascar: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,987 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.