Costa Rica vs Myanmar: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
153.76 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Myanmar
162.22 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
120th
Myanmar rank
119th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Myanmar
02505007501.0k1.2k196119922024

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 162.22 tonnes per square kilometre against 153.76 tonnes per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 8.46 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 17 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 120th and Myanmar ranks 119th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and Myanmar in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 591.02 tonnes per square kilometre 217.27 tonnes per square kilometre 373.75 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 854.34 tonnes per square kilometre 226.16 tonnes per square kilometre 628.18 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 530.64 tonnes per square kilometre 96.47 tonnes per square kilometre 434.17 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 143.79 tonnes per square kilometre 128.75 tonnes per square kilometre 15.04 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 195.14 tonnes per square kilometre 239.89 tonnes per square kilometre 44.75 tonnes per square kilometre Myanmar
2010s 203.06 tonnes per square kilometre 205.61 tonnes per square kilometre 2.55 tonnes per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 141.15 tonnes per square kilometre 167.19 tonnes per square kilometre 26.04 tonnes per square kilometre Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 162.22 tonnes per square kilometre against 153.76 tonnes per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Myanmar?
8.46 tonnes per square kilometre, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Myanmar?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Myanmar rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 120th and Myanmar ranks 119th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Myanmar: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/myanmar/">Costa Rica vs Myanmar: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,987 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.