Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
153.76 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
New Zealand
175.53 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
120th
New Zealand rank
117th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • New Zealand
02505007501.0k1.2k196119922024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 175.53 tonnes per square kilometre against 153.76 tonnes per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 21.77 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 120th and New Zealand ranks 117th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 4 and New Zealand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 591.02 tonnes per square kilometre 103.95 tonnes per square kilometre 487.07 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1970s 854.34 tonnes per square kilometre 165.42 tonnes per square kilometre 688.92 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1980s 530.64 tonnes per square kilometre 157.13 tonnes per square kilometre 373.5 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
1990s 143.79 tonnes per square kilometre 151.53 tonnes per square kilometre 7.74 tonnes per square kilometre New Zealand
2000s 195.14 tonnes per square kilometre 198.35 tonnes per square kilometre 3.21 tonnes per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 203.06 tonnes per square kilometre 199.94 tonnes per square kilometre 3.12 tonnes per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 141.15 tonnes per square kilometre 190.8 tonnes per square kilometre 49.66 tonnes per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 175.53 tonnes per square kilometre against 153.76 tonnes per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and New Zealand?
21.77 tonnes per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and New Zealand?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and New Zealand rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 120th and New Zealand ranks 117th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/new-zealand/">Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,987 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.