Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre

Equatorial Guinea
298.86 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Serbia
292.44 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
78th
Serbia rank
80th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Serbia
-1000100200300196119922024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 298.86 tonnes per square kilometre against 292.44 tonnes per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 6.42 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 80th of 192 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 242.38 tonnes per square kilometre 257.1 tonnes per square kilometre 14.72 tonnes per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 268.95 tonnes per square kilometre 231.31 tonnes per square kilometre 37.64 tonnes per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 312.25 tonnes per square kilometre 295.46 tonnes per square kilometre 16.8 tonnes per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre, Equatorial Guinea or Serbia?
Equatorial Guinea, at 298.86 tonnes per square kilometre against 292.44 tonnes per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre between Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
6.42 tonnes per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Serbia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Serbia rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 80th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/serbia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Serbia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,987 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.