Grenada vs Switzerland: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre

Grenada
851.3 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Switzerland
808.51 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Grenada rank
33rd
Switzerland rank
34th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Grenada
  • Switzerland
-50005001.0k196119922024

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 851.3 tonnes per square kilometre against 808.51 tonnes per square kilometre in Switzerland, a difference of 42.79 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Switzerland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Switzerland ahead.

Grenada ranks 33rd and Switzerland ranks 34th of 192 countries.

Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Switzerland Difference Ahead
1960s 196.11 tonnes per square kilometre 789.85 tonnes per square kilometre 593.74 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
1970s 22.88 tonnes per square kilometre 1,063 tonnes per square kilometre 1,040 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
1980s -202.12 tonnes per square kilometre 1,027 tonnes per square kilometre 1,229 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
1990s 73.76 tonnes per square kilometre 1,136 tonnes per square kilometre 1,062 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
2000s 456.14 tonnes per square kilometre 1,133 tonnes per square kilometre 676.98 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
2010s 430.83 tonnes per square kilometre 1,012 tonnes per square kilometre 580.72 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland
2020s 709.39 tonnes per square kilometre 842.19 tonnes per square kilometre 132.8 tonnes per square kilometre Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre, Grenada or Switzerland?
Grenada, at 851.3 tonnes per square kilometre against 808.51 tonnes per square kilometre in Switzerland as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre between Grenada and Switzerland?
42.79 tonnes per square kilometre, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Switzerland?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Grenada and Switzerland rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre?
Grenada ranks 33rd and Switzerland ranks 34th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Switzerland: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/grenada/switzerland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/grenada/switzerland/">Grenada vs Switzerland: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,987 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.