Hungary vs South Africa: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre

Hungary
320.75 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
South Africa
365.71 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Hungary rank
72nd
South Africa rank
70th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Hungary
  • South Africa
2004006008001.0k196119922024

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 365.71 tonnes per square kilometre against 320.75 tonnes per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 44.96 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 72nd and South Africa ranks 70th of 192 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 623.01 tonnes per square kilometre 160.51 tonnes per square kilometre 462.5 tonnes per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 814.6 tonnes per square kilometre 210.68 tonnes per square kilometre 603.91 tonnes per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 901.78 tonnes per square kilometre 307.45 tonnes per square kilometre 594.33 tonnes per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 648.54 tonnes per square kilometre 352.55 tonnes per square kilometre 295.99 tonnes per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 572.54 tonnes per square kilometre 387.08 tonnes per square kilometre 185.46 tonnes per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 420.58 tonnes per square kilometre 385.46 tonnes per square kilometre 35.11 tonnes per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 391.44 tonnes per square kilometre 362.27 tonnes per square kilometre 29.17 tonnes per square kilometre Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre, Hungary or South Africa?
South Africa, at 365.71 tonnes per square kilometre against 320.75 tonnes per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre between Hungary and South Africa?
44.96 tonnes per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and South Africa?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Hungary and South Africa rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre?
Hungary ranks 72nd and South Africa ranks 70th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs South Africa: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/hungary/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/hungary/south-africa/">Hungary vs South Africa: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,987 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.