Jamaica vs Liechtenstein: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre

Jamaica
739.71 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Liechtenstein
732.65 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Jamaica rank
42nd
Liechtenstein rank
44th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Jamaica
  • Liechtenstein
05001.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k196119922024

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 739.71 tonnes per square kilometre against 732.65 tonnes per square kilometre in Liechtenstein, a difference of 7.06 tonnes per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 42nd and Liechtenstein ranks 44th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 3 and Liechtenstein in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
1960s 322.29 tonnes per square kilometre 305.15 tonnes per square kilometre 17.13 tonnes per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 694.65 tonnes per square kilometre 771.32 tonnes per square kilometre 76.67 tonnes per square kilometre Liechtenstein
1980s 577.61 tonnes per square kilometre 923.33 tonnes per square kilometre 345.71 tonnes per square kilometre Liechtenstein
1990s 1,325 tonnes per square kilometre 1,269 tonnes per square kilometre 55.55 tonnes per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 1,535 tonnes per square kilometre 1,290 tonnes per square kilometre 245.39 tonnes per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 853.1 tonnes per square kilometre 932.47 tonnes per square kilometre 79.37 tonnes per square kilometre Liechtenstein
2020s 670.61 tonnes per square kilometre 753.31 tonnes per square kilometre 82.7 tonnes per square kilometre Liechtenstein

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre, Jamaica or Liechtenstein?
Jamaica, at 739.71 tonnes per square kilometre against 732.65 tonnes per square kilometre in Liechtenstein as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre between Jamaica and Liechtenstein?
7.06 tonnes per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Liechtenstein?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Jamaica and Liechtenstein rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre?
Jamaica ranks 42nd and Liechtenstein ranks 44th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Liechtenstein: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/liechtenstein/">Jamaica vs Liechtenstein: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,987 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.