Mauritania vs Namibia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre

Mauritania
5.44 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Namibia
9.86 tonnes per square kilometre
in 2024
Mauritania rank
188th
Namibia rank
185th

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritania
  • Namibia
051015196119922024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 9.86 tonnes per square kilometre against 5.44 tonnes per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 4.42 tonnes per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.8 times Mauritania's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Mauritania ranks 188th and Namibia ranks 185th of 192 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.17 tonnes per square kilometre 7.29 tonnes per square kilometre 5.12 tonnes per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 2.13 tonnes per square kilometre 6.12 tonnes per square kilometre 3.99 tonnes per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 3.2 tonnes per square kilometre 8.54 tonnes per square kilometre 5.34 tonnes per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 5.14 tonnes per square kilometre 10.96 tonnes per square kilometre 5.83 tonnes per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre, Mauritania or Namibia?
Namibia, at 9.86 tonnes per square kilometre against 5.44 tonnes per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2024.
What is the difference in annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre between Mauritania and Namibia?
4.42 tonnes per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Namibia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Mauritania and Namibia rank globally for annual co₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre?
Mauritania ranks 188th and Namibia ranks 185th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Namibia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-co2-emissions-including-land-use-change-per-square-kilometre/mauritania/namibia/">Mauritania vs Namibia: Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change, per square kilometre
Unit
tonnes per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 10,987 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Annual CO₂ emissions including land-use change divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.