Eritrea vs Namibia: Annual co2 including land use
Eritrea
8.15 million
in 2024
Namibia
8.11 million
in 2024
Eritrea rank
136th
Namibia rank
137th
Annual co2 including land use over time
- Eritrea
- Namibia
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 8.15 million against 8.11 million in Namibia, a difference of 38,750.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Namibia ahead.
Eritrea ranks 136th and Namibia ranks 137th of 194 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -222,903 | 6.39 million | 6.62 million | Namibia |
| 2000s | 4.50 million | 5.04 million | 544,676 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 6.37 million | 7.03 million | 663,637 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 8.05 million | 9.03 million | 975,218 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual co2 including land use, Eritrea or Namibia?
- Eritrea, at 8.15 million against 8.11 million in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in annual co2 including land use between Eritrea and Namibia?
- 38,750, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Namibia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
- How do Eritrea and Namibia rank globally for annual co2 including land use?
- Eritrea ranks 136th and Namibia ranks 137th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.