Afghanistan vs Eswatini: Annual freshwater withdrawals, total
Annual freshwater withdrawals, total over time
- Afghanistan
- Eswatini
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 43.0% against 40.5% in Eswatini, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
Across all 43 years both countries report, Afghanistan has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan ranks 36th and Eswatini ranks 38th of 177 countries.
Afghanistan has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 47.4% | 28.2% | 19.2% | Afghanistan |
| 1990s | 47.1% | 35.5% | 11.6% | Afghanistan |
| 2000s | 43.0% | 40.2% | 2.9% | Afghanistan |
| 2010s | 43.0% | 40.5% | 2.6% | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 43.0% | 40.5% | 2.6% | Afghanistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual freshwater withdrawals, total, Afghanistan or Eswatini?
- Afghanistan, at 43.0% against 40.5% in Eswatini as of 2022.
- What is the difference in annual freshwater withdrawals, total between Afghanistan and Eswatini?
- 2.5%, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Eswatini?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2022.
- How do Afghanistan and Eswatini rank globally for annual freshwater withdrawals, total?
- Afghanistan ranks 36th and Eswatini ranks 38th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual freshwater withdrawals refer to total water withdrawals, not counting evaporation losses from storage basins. Withdrawals also include water from desalination plants in countries where they are a significant source. Withdrawals can exceed 100 percent of total renewable resources where extraction from nonrenewable aquifers or desalination plants is considerable or where there is significant water reuse. Withdrawals for agriculture and industry are total withdrawals for irrigation and livestock production and for direct industrial use (including withdrawals for cooling thermoelectric plants). Withdrawals for domestic uses include drinking water, municipal use or supply, and use for public services, commercial establishments, and homes. Data are for the most recent year available for 1987-2002.