Eswatini vs Palestine, State of: Annual freshwater withdrawals, total
Annual freshwater withdrawals, total over time
- Eswatini
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Palestine, State of currently reports 41.2% against 40.5% in Eswatini, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 38th and Palestine, State of ranks 37th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.2% | 42.9% | 2.7% | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 40.5% | 35.7% | 4.8% | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 40.5% | 42.3% | 1.9% | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher annual freshwater withdrawals, total, Eswatini or Palestine, State of?
- Palestine, State of, at 41.2% against 40.5% in Eswatini as of 2021.
- What is the difference in annual freshwater withdrawals, total between Eswatini and Palestine, State of?
- 0.7%, with Palestine, State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Palestine, State of?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Eswatini and Palestine, State of rank globally for annual freshwater withdrawals, total?
- Eswatini ranks 38th and Palestine, State of ranks 37th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- AQUASTAT - FAO's Global Information System on Water and Agriculture, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Annual freshwater withdrawals, total (% of internal resources). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Annual freshwater withdrawals refer to total water withdrawals, not counting evaporation losses from storage basins. Withdrawals also include water from desalination plants in countries where they are a significant source. Withdrawals can exceed 100 percent of total renewable resources where extraction from nonrenewable aquifers or desalination plants is considerable or where there is significant water reuse. Withdrawals for agriculture and industry are total withdrawals for irrigation and livestock production and for direct industrial use (including withdrawals for cooling thermoelectric plants). Withdrawals for domestic uses include drinking water, municipal use or supply, and use for public services, commercial establishments, and homes. Data are for the most recent year available for 1987-2002.