Ecuador vs Norway: Year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs.

Ecuador
5.29 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Norway
5.32 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Ecuador rank
21st
Norway rank
20th

Year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. over time

  • Ecuador
  • Norway
-20020196619952025

How they compare

Norway currently reports 5.32 terawatt-hours against 5.29 terawatt-hours in Ecuador, a difference of 0.03 terawatt-hours.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1966 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 21st and Norway ranks 20th of 80 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0287 terawatt-hours 1.98 terawatt-hours 1.95 terawatt-hours Norway
1970s 0.0345 terawatt-hours 3.13 terawatt-hours 3.1 terawatt-hours Norway
1980s 0.4245 terawatt-hours 2.98 terawatt-hours 2.55 terawatt-hours Norway
1990s 0.2223 terawatt-hours 0.3816 terawatt-hours 0.1594 terawatt-hours Norway
2000s 0.2708 terawatt-hours 0.5738 terawatt-hours 0.303 terawatt-hours Norway
2010s 1.66 terawatt-hours 0.8683 terawatt-hours 0.796 terawatt-hours Ecuador
2020s 0.5768 terawatt-hours 4.89 terawatt-hours 4.31 terawatt-hours Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy, Ecuador or Norway?
Norway, at 5.32 terawatt-hours against 5.29 terawatt-hours in Ecuador as of 2025.
What is the difference in year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy between Ecuador and Norway?
0.03 terawatt-hours, with Norway ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Norway?
60 years are reported by both, from 1966 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Norway rank globally for year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy?
Ecuador ranks 21st and Norway ranks 20th of 80 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Energy Institute – Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Norway: Year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy. Statizoid, drawing on Energy Institute – Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-primary-energy-fossil-vs-low-carbon/ecuador/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/annual-primary-energy-fossil-vs-low-carbon/ecuador/norway/">Ecuador vs Norway: Year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Year-to-year change in primary energy from fossil fuels vs. low-carbon energy
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Energy Institute – Statistical Review of World Energy (2026) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
82 places, 4,598 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

Change in total energy supply relative to the previous year, measured in terawatt-hours.