Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Morocco: Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2.28 kt
in 2050
Morocco
0.7571 kt
in 2050
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
14th
Morocco rank
15th

Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Morocco
00.511.522.5196120052050

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 2.28 kt against 0.7571 kt in Morocco, a difference of 1.52 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 3.0 times Morocco's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Morocco ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Morocco ranks 15th of 30 groups.

Across the 9 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 6 and Morocco in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1199 kt 0.4184 kt 0.2985 kt Morocco
1970s 0.1274 kt 0.5246 kt 0.3972 kt Morocco
1980s 0.1161 kt 0.5678 kt 0.4517 kt Morocco
1990s 1.31 kt 0.5317 kt 0.7775 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 1.17 kt 0.4899 kt 0.6807 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 1.54 kt 0.4972 kt 1.05 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 1.69 kt 0.3432 kt 1.34 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2030s 1.79 kt 0.6122 kt 1.18 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2050s 2.28 kt 0.7571 kt 1.53 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher barley — crop residues, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Morocco?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 2.28 kt against 0.7571 kt in Morocco as of 2050.
What is the difference in barley — crop residues between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Morocco?
1.52 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Morocco?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Morocco rank globally for barley — crop residues?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 14th and Morocco ranks 15th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Morocco: Barley — Crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/barley-crop-residues-direct-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/morocco/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Morocco: Barley — Crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Barley — Crop residues (Direct emissions N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
147 places, 7,969 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).